Common Workplace Mediation Mistakes
Common mistakes people make in workplace mediation (and how to avoid them) At Resolution at Work, we spend a lot of time helping people have conversations… Read more »
Mediation at Work has teamed up with MBTI experts to create an opportunity for people to learn about their ways of handling conflict and to develop these through using the Myers Briggs Type Indicator – a powerful tool for gaining insights into one’s own personality and understanding others’ and how this relates to handling conflict.
The workshop is likely to be of interest to people who have responsibility for managing and leading individuals and teams, to people who need to work in partnership with others, and to those who support and advise people in handling interpersonal conflict at work.
The workshop is highly interactive and will highlight the values and challenges that different personality types bring to handling conflict. It will draw on theory, conflict resolution models (including TKI conflict mode instrument), examples from practice and experiences from the group. All participants will be invited to complete the MBTI questionnaire in advance of the workshop and will be offered the option to follow this up after the workshop in individual sessions with an accredited MBTI practitioner.
Common mistakes people make in workplace mediation (and how to avoid them) At Resolution at Work, we spend a lot of time helping people have conversations… Read more »
Difficult Conversations Done Right: Why Avoiding Them Is the Real Problem Difficult conversations are a part of every workplace. Whether it’s addressing poor performance, resolving tension… Read more »
It is not uncommon for conflict to arise between different teams. This can have considerable impact on both individuals and performance. A number of approaches can be used in this sort of scenario, including neutral assessment, team facilitation and group mediation.
Agreement could not be reached to enter into mediation in this situation and therefore coaching was an alternative support provided to one of the parties. The relationship between a majority shareholder and a shareholder/director was causing conflict. The relationship would be ok at times but disagreements would flare up from time to time and this was beginning to impact on the business.