Email: [email protected] Tel: 08000 489235 Twitter LinkedIn
Many cases involve “personality clashes” or different people styles. Mediation is a perfect process to enable parties to understand these differences and find more effective ways of working together. One such case involved a clash between two senior employees; there had been a change to the senior management structure including a new CEO having been recently appointed. One senior employee felt that his role and status had been diminished whilst the CEO felt that the changes made best use of skills and experience. The conflict between them was beginning to impact on their relationship and trust was breaking down. There was a real risk of loss of key expertise to the company if the conflict could not be resolved.
The mediator met with each party individually initially and then facilitated a joint meeting. During the mediation, it became clear that there were differing personal styles which contributed to the way the dispute had escalated. In addition there were “cultural” difference between them which was also impacting and causing misunderstandings.
In the joint meeting, the parties were able to clarify a number of misunderstandings and (whilst they did not entirely agree) were better able to understand the other’s viewpoint and perspective. The parties were able to work out an agreement about how to adapt their working practices and communication styles to ensure that they avoided further misunderstandings in the future and to restore trust between them. The mediation was followed with some individual coaching sessions which included consideration of each others conflict styles (using TKI assessments) leading to increased appreciation of the impact of different styles and responses to conflict situations and how to manage these.
Our newsletter provides details of latest news, upcoming events and links to interesting articles around the topic of conflict resolution, mediation and training.
From my perspective the whole process has gone very smoothly, from my initial call with Alison through to Sarah your office manager completing our new supplier paperwork and of course John for being proactive in contacting me. Both [redacted] and [redacted] have also asked me to pass on their thanks to you, [redacted] also mentioned he was very impressed with the service that has been provided.
HR Manager |
I have recently become an accredited [email protected] coach and so have added this tool and skill set to the accredited conflict coaching models that I have… Read more »
As an active member of the CMC Workplace and Employment workgroup, I was delighted to be asked to be involved in a series of events that… Read more »
It is not uncommon for conflict to arise between different teams. This can have considerable impact on both individuals and performance. A number of approaches can be used in this sort of scenario, including neutral assessment, team facilitation and group mediation.
Agreement could not be reached to enter into mediation in this situation and therefore coaching was an alternative support provided to one of the parties. The relationship between a majority shareholder and a shareholder/director was causing conflict. The relationship would be ok at times but disagreements would flare up from time to time and this was beginning to impact on the business.