Conflict Coaching – Shareholder/Director dispute
The CINERGY model enabled the individual to better understand the conflict situation from both perspectives and the contribution that each was making to the situation. The Confict […] Read more »
The CINERGY model enabled the individual to better understand the conflict situation from both perspectives and the contribution that each was making to the situation. The Confict […] Read more »
The coaching enabled the employee to better understand the conflict situation and how he may have contributed to this by his communication style and his reactions and […] Read more »
In this case an individual had raised a formal grievance alleging bullying and harassment. This resulted in an exit agreement being reached with the alleged bully leaving […] Read more »
New ACAS Code of Practice puts mediation centre stage: What employers need to know For the first time in over 15 years, ACAS has published a… Read more »
If you've worked in management for any length of time, you'll know that workplace conflict is inevitable. People work under pressure. They have different personalities, different… Read more »
It is not uncommon for conflict to arise between different teams. This can have considerable impact on both individuals and performance. A number of approaches can be used in this sort of scenario, including neutral assessment, team facilitation and group mediation.
Agreement could not be reached to enter into mediation in this situation and therefore coaching was an alternative support provided to one of the parties. The relationship between a majority shareholder and a shareholder/director was causing conflict. The relationship would be ok at times but disagreements would flare up from time to time and this was beginning to impact on the business.