
CIPD in Wales Awards 2024 Best Learning and Development Initiative
We had a fabulous evening at the CIPD in Wales awards on Friday! We wined, we dined and we danced the night away. It was fantastic… Read more »
Email: [email protected] Tel: 08000 489235 LinkedIn
Neutral Assessment: another conflict resolution option
Last month our new Managing Director, Alison Love, reflected on the causes and approaches to workplace mediation and one of her reflections was that there seems to be a greater awareness and recognition that mediation is a preferable option to the use of formal processes and mediation seems to be being proposed at a much earlier stage.
We are certainly encouraged by the increase in awareness around the use of mediation. But what other forms of conflict resolution are there?
At the CIPD Wales conference this month, in a room full of HR professionals navigating the snakes and ladders of conflict and considering alternative options to try and resolve a conflict scenario, the most commonly asked question was, “What is a neutral assessment?” So I thought I would write a brief blog about the neutral assessment process, what this is and when you might use it.
The best way to describe a neutral assessment is a process which is somewhere between a mediation and a workplace investigation.
It is particularly useful where there are complex issues that need to be explored, for example where there are large group conflicts or collective grievances resulting in dysfunctional teams.
Alternatively, it can be useful where there are no specific allegations but it is clear that people are stressed and impacted by the situation. It is outside of any formal processes; it is not about who is right or wrong but focuses on finding solutions with a fresh set of eyes.
The process is conducted by an independent expert who has no vested interest in the outcome and who will:-
The Benefits
The benefits of the process include:-
The process explained
The process will generally include the following:-
The process itself is not a solution but it can lead to recommendations or outcomes which assist in achieving resolutions. For example it can lead to apologies or acknowledgements of contributions, individual mediations, small group facilitation, identification of developmental needs, consideration of restructuring or organisational learning.
If you think that you have a situation which might benefit from a neutral assessment or would just like some further information on how the process works in practice please contact me to discuss. Alternatively, this is another option to consider as and when a situation arises.
Follow us on LinkedIn, where we provide details of latest news, upcoming events and links to interesting articles around the topic of conflict resolution, mediation and training.
I have found the experience of coaching extremely positive. From the initial assessment of my traits (using the CDP Model) to working one to one with Naomi, I have managed to identify personal development objectives and have been provided with new techniques and support to achieve them. I cannot recommend this service more, especially for people in the Veterinary industry that often do not receive these skills within their training. I feel much more confident in completing my job role with minimal personal stress.
Emma Martin, Head RVN and JVP, Vets4Pets |
We had a fabulous evening at the CIPD in Wales awards on Friday! We wined, we dined and we danced the night away. It was fantastic… Read more »
3 new members of the Resolution at Work team have recently become certified in the fantastic Conflict Dynamics Profile model for conflict coaching, and we have… Read more »
It is not uncommon for conflict to arise between different teams. This can have considerable impact on both individuals and performance. A number of approaches can be used in this sort of scenario, including neutral assessment, team facilitation and group mediation.
Agreement could not be reached to enter into mediation in this situation and therefore coaching was an alternative support provided to one of the parties. The relationship between a majority shareholder and a shareholder/director was causing conflict. The relationship would be ok at times but disagreements would flare up from time to time and this was beginning to impact on the business.