CIPD in Wales Awards 2024 Best Learning and Development Initiative
We had a fabulous evening at the CIPD in Wales awards on Friday! We wined, we dined and we danced the night away. It was fantastic… Read more »
Email: [email protected] Tel: 08000 489235 LinkedIn
Recent CIPD research confirms that conflict is a common feature at work, that the role of line managers is pivotal and that employers are making increased use of mediation and other forms of dispute resolution. Details are summarised below together with how these findings mirror some analysis of my own mediation practice and experience.
The first report, Conflict management: A Shift in Direction, indicates that one in ten organisations reported having used external mediation in the last year; an increase of 33%. In addition there is an increase in employers investing in developing conflict resolution skills for managers and HR staff so that they are better placed to intervene or manage a difficult conversation. Over 50% of respondents in all sectors reported an increase in such training.
Interestingly there is an increased interest in using Settlement Agreements as a means of terminating employment without the need to go through a time consuming, and often painful, performance management process. However 40% felt that Settlement Agreements should only be used when other attempts to improve the situation have been utilised.
Getting Under the Skin of Workplace Conflict reports that workplace conflict has been experienced by one in three employees in the past year with 28% of those indicating that this led to ongoing difficulties in working relationships. In 38% of cases the difficulties were said to involve conflict with line managers rather than colleagues. Also concerns were far more likely to be highlighted by a junior employee rather than a manager. This report also highlights the significant costs associated with unresolved conflict including loss of productivity, increased stress, sickness absence, loss of management time and in some cases increased turnover.
These reports demonstrate that the role of line managers is pivotal; managers have a crucial role in building teams with strong relationships where employees can challenge appropriately and where any conflict is managed in a positive way. Fortunately the research also suggests that employers are increasingly committed to investing resources in developing mangers skills in these areas and to resolving issues positively and in ways that seek to retain employees.
The CIPD findings mirror the growth of the mediation instructions and in-house training that my business undertakes.
I have now been actively and regularly mediating workplace and employment disputes for around 4 years and thought it was about time to do some analysis of the type and growth of instructions and to identify any common themes. Over this period mediation instructions have grown by 61%, with incremental growth year on year. In-house training for mediation or conflict resolution skills for HR and line managers has also increased significantly. My recent book (and accompanying training) Mediation Skills for Managers focuses on how mediation skills and techniques can improve the ability to positively resolve conflict and day to day management of staff.
With regard to mediation instructions, I analysed theses on the basis of the parties concerned and the contributing factors.
Parties
Causes/contributing factors
I also analysed instructions on the basis of the causes or contributing factors and these are set out below (as percentages of the total instructions). Unsurprisingly perhaps communication features most highly; in reality this will have featured in every situation to some degree or other. The impact of change and management style are each a contributing factor in around 20% of cases. Often issues arise when there is a change of manager who adopts a different style and approach to how a team and the performance of individuals is managed.
12% of cases are referred following a formal grievance or disciplinary process has been either initiated or exhausted.
It may be difficult to draw any definitive conclusions from my own analysis on what is inevitably a relatively small sample and a degree of subjective classification regarding causes or contributing factors. However, both my analysis and the CIPD research demonstrate that the role of the manager is clearly an important factor in many cases. This supports the need for managers to be skilled in such things as managing change, effective communication and conflict resolution as well as understanding the impact of change and unresolved conflict on others.
Follow us on LinkedIn, where we provide details of latest news, upcoming events and links to interesting articles around the topic of conflict resolution, mediation and training.
I have found the experience of coaching extremely positive. From the initial assessment of my traits (using the CDP Model) to working one to one with Naomi, I have managed to identify personal development objectives and have been provided with new techniques and support to achieve them. I cannot recommend this service more, especially for people in the Veterinary industry that often do not receive these skills within their training. I feel much more confident in completing my job role with minimal personal stress.
Emma Martin, Head RVN and JVP, Vets4Pets |
We had a fabulous evening at the CIPD in Wales awards on Friday! We wined, we dined and we danced the night away. It was fantastic… Read more »
3 new members of the Resolution at Work team have recently become certified in the fantastic Conflict Dynamics Profile model for conflict coaching, and we have… Read more »
It is not uncommon for conflict to arise between different teams. This can have considerable impact on both individuals and performance. A number of approaches can be used in this sort of scenario, including neutral assessment, team facilitation and group mediation.
Agreement could not be reached to enter into mediation in this situation and therefore coaching was an alternative support provided to one of the parties. The relationship between a majority shareholder and a shareholder/director was causing conflict. The relationship would be ok at times but disagreements would flare up from time to time and this was beginning to impact on the business.